| Aim and purpose | The county of Humberside was created in 1974 following the introduction of the Local Government Act of 1972. It was composed of two halves either side of the Humber estuary, created using part of the East and West Ridings of Yorkshire and Lincolnshire, Parts of Lindsey. In local government terms it was abolished on 1 April 1996, with the establishment of four unitary authorities: North Lincolnshire, North East Lincolnshire, Kingston upon Hull and East Riding of Yorkshire. The name has continued in use as a geographic term and in the names of institutions such as Humberside Police and Fire Services. Several of the other "new" counties created in 1974, such as Avon and Cleveland, were also abolished and replaced with unitary authorities at this time.
In the years immediately following the establishment of the county it proved to be unpopular as can be seen by numerous campaigns, petitions and other manifestations of
dissatisfaction with the new county, its name and its boundaries that took place1. Speaking in the House of Commons in 1994, James Cran, the MP for Beverley said. "I am sorry to say that Humberside county council was imposed on us by a Conservative Government back in the early 1970s. That was a considerable mistake. That is evidenced, if by nothing else, by the fact that almost the day after the decision was announced, a campaign began to have Humberside abolished. That was not a very good start. The result is that in 20 years or so no loyalty or, to be fair, little loyalty has built up between the electorate and Humberside county council2."
A formal review of Humberside was undertaken between July 1985
and July 1988 by the Local Government Boundary Commission for England (LGBC). The Commission recommended that there be no major change to the structure of local government in the area. The Department for the Environment guidelines were clear in stating that abolition of a principal area of local administration would be appropriate only in
very exceptional circumstances, where the present arrangements were
clearly failing to provide effective and convenient local
government. LGBC's findings indicated that even allowing for the strength of feeling against the
county, Humberside could not be shown to have failed to provide effective and convenient local
government3. Immediately following this review, the Department for the Environment announced that LGBC would be asked to undertake a further review of Humberside. The
Secretary of State accepted that, in the light of departmental
guidelines, it was reasonable for LGBC to have
concluded that it could not be shown that Humberside had
failed to provide effective and convenient local
government. However, he expressed concern at the degree of
unhappiness at the concept of Humberside 15 years after its
creation, and considered that the time had come to re-examine
the justification for its existence. Consequently, LGBC were asked to carry out a further review as rapidly as
possible. The terms of reference of the further review set aside the guidance against proposing the abolition of a principal local
authority except in very exceptional circumstances. LGBC were specifically asked to study the radical option of
dissolving the County of Humberside in the light of possible
alternative arrangements and to consider the costs and benefits of introducing alternative arrangements compared with
maintaining the present position. As part of carrying out their further review LGBC conducted a programme
of survey research to investigate the attitudes to and preferences for the options
for the future of Humberside among residents of the County and others who
may be affected by the possible alternatives. Research Surveys
of Great Britain Limited (RSGB) were commissioned to conduct this research.
The Humberside attitudes and preferences survey carried out by RSGB had the following specific aims:
- to determine the sense of identity with and loyalty towards the County
of Humberside;
- to determine preferences for each of the proposed alternative
arrangements;
- to investigate the reasons why people felt the way they did about the
existing situation and the proposed options;
- to investigate how all these opinions and attitudes differed from one part
of Humberside to another.
The outcome of the research was broadly in line with the findings of LGBC's previous review of the county. The majority of residents felt that the establishment of the county of Humberside had been a bad idea and in general they felt a stronger affiliation to the pre-1974 counties than they did to Humberside. The most popular of the alternative options for the area was the abolition of Humberside, with North Humberside being replaced by a separate county of East Yorkshire and South Humberside being transferred to Lincolnshire. The majority of Selby residents identified strongly with North Yorkshire and were opposed to becoming part of a new county of East Yorkshire.
Before any of the changes recommended by the 1989-1990 review of Humberside could be implemented a more general review of local government structures in the UK was introduced under the Local Government Act 1992. As part of this more widespread review the county of Humberside was abolished on 1 April 1996 and replaced by the four unitary local authorities referred to above. |
|---|